Modules
  · Home
· About K9
· Downloads
· Feedback: Email BD
· Forums
· Forums & Site Members
· Journal
· K9 & Friends Chat
· K9 Clan Members
· K9 Gallery
· Links
· Private Messages
· Search
· Stories Archive
· Submit News
· Surveys
· Top 10
· Your Account
 
Friends Of [K9]
 

[K9] Dingos Maps


Cops Playing DOD


Eat My Peas Clan


Freedom Fighters Clan


kustom Kettle DOD Maps

 

 
[K9] Kennel Club: National News

Search on This Topic:   
[ Go to Home | Select a New Topic ]
 

Your Gas Money For A Flatscreen
 

National News
National News  

By Glenn Beck - CNN


1.733


This number should put our skyrocketing gas prices into perspective. To explain: In January 2007, gas prices were at a measly $2.17 a gallon. Since then they've skyrocketed to more than $4. Considering the average amount of gas used per household, the rise has cost us approximately $1,690. With the average 42-inch plasma screen going for $975, just the extra cash you've forked over for gas in the last year and a half could have bought you 1.733 plasma TVs. And that number just keeps rising.


Of course, there are a lot more serious issues than the "flat screen factor." Gas prices have changed families who were once able to save a little into families breaking even. Families who used to break even now run up credit cards. Families who ran up credit cards now dodge calls from creditors. And families who dodged calls from creditors are now families in full-fledged financial crisis. (Like Ed McMahon, I've heard.)


So, the question is: What do we do?


President Bush and many Republicans argue that increasing domestic production of oil is the right strategy. Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain has become a recent convert to this philosophy as well; at least as far as offshore drilling is concerned. (His lack of support for drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge [ANWR] is a distinction I can't understand. If we can drill safely without environmental harm under thousands of feet of water, why not on a small patch of ice in the middle of thousands of desolate square miles?)


Those who disagree with drilling here usually cite one of a few standard arguments:


"It's not going to help for another 10 years!"


Here's the thing. America is a long-term plan for me. I don't know where these people plan to be in 10 years, but I plan to be here. This is, of course, the same argument heard around President Clinton's veto of ANWR drilling in 1995. Among other things, if we had started drilling ANWR then, oil would be already flowing. At its peak, ANWR could supply 1.45 million barrels per day, enough to tell Hugo Chavez and all his Venezuelan oil to shove it (with a little change left over). Of course, Clinton didn't have Chavez to deal with back then. If only he were thinking 10 years into the future.


“We can't drill ourselves out of this problem!"


Maybe not solely, or forever, but it sure can help. With new technology, who knows what we can do over time?  The government estimates that the outer continental shelf alone has 76 billion barrels of oil that are recoverable, and that's just with today's technology.
To put that number into perspective, it's equal to every barrel of oil that we'd import from everywhere outside of North America for 31 years at our current pace. But instead of developing these resources, we throw up endless roadblocks.  If you don't think that pumping more of our own oil would affect prices, ask yourself what would happen if we did the opposite. What if we announced today that we were turning all of our existing pumps off?


"What about the environment?"


This may surprise those who think I'm the pre-eminent murderer of the Earth, but the only real argument against owning our own oil destiny is an environmental one.
Under this theory: High gas prices equal less gas usage, which equals a saved planet. Thomas Friedman, in a recent column, laid it out in an honest fashion: "Now that [gas] is $4 a gallon, the government should at least keep it there, since it is really having the right effect."


He went on to describe Chrysler's promotion that guarantees cheaper gas as "the moral equivalent of tobacco companies offering discounted cigarettes to teenagers." Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, apparently agrees, saying that coal and oil are making us sick along with "ruining our country" and "ruining our world."  If you believe such nonsense, then it's perfectly rational to ignore our ample energy resources. (It's not rational to combine that with complaints about high gas prices, sorry Harry Reid.)


For the rest of us, while visions of the Exxon Valdez may dance through your head, the National Academy of Sciences found that the offshore industry is among the safest industrial activities in the United States.  And please, next time you hear someone complaining about environmental risks of drilling at home, remember this from a 2003 speech from the director of the US Minerals Management Services: "Imports present an environmental risk of spills about 13 times greater than domestic production" and "natural seeps account for 150-175 times more oil in the ocean than outer continental shelf oil and gas operations."  NATURAL SEEPS? Now we know who the real polluter is -- that evil wench -- Mother Nature.


"It's all the speculators"



Speculation has a place in all markets, but as usual our lawmakers and much of the media are focused on the wrong thing. Speculators don't make money when the markets go up, they make it when they are right. The proper question to ask isn't, "How do we stop the speculators?" It is, "What are the speculators speculating about?"  They are trying to predict oil prices in a world they know will have increased demand, with the explosive growth in developing economies like China and India and where the No. 1 oil consumer refuses to take drilling seriously. Which way would you bet oil prices were going? Think what would happen if our government acted decisively and let the world know that we will fully develop our own energy resources - From oil drilling, to coal to liquids, to shale, to new refineries, to nuclear power, to alternative fuels.

What if nothing were off the table and the hurdles were removed? What if we let the world know that we will not sit idly by and let two-faced friends and stone-faced enemies determine the lifeblood of our civilization?
 
What if we demonstrated that with real action instead of empty words?


I'd like to find out. It's time for a new flat screen.




 

Thursday, July 03 @ 17:12:23 UTC (Read More... | 35 comments | Score: 1)


Archived: Gamer uses virtual training to save lives
 

National News
National News  

[K9] Lassie writes "
Think playing video games is little more than a great way to waste time? Then you haven't met Paxton Galvanek. Last November, the twenty-eight year-old helped rescue two victims from an overturned SUV on the shoulder of a North Carolina interstate. As the first one on the scene, Galvanek safely removed both individuals from the smoking vehicle and properly assessed and treated their wounds, which included bruises, scrapes, head trauma and the loss of two fingers.

His medical background? None - other than what he's learned playing as a medic in the computer game America's Army.
The first-person shooter is developed and distributed by the U.S. Army. Though part of its mission is to promote its military namesake, America's Army is a fully-featured game that takes players through a virtual representation of real-life soldiering, from basic training to the field of battle. To play as a medic class, players must sit through extensive medical training tutorials based on real-life classes.

Lucky for the two survivors that Paxton Galvanek didn't zone out during the training, as the gamer credits this experience with teaching him how to handle himself in an emergency situation.

"In the case of this accident, I evaluated the situation and placed priority on the driver of the car who had missing fingers," he said. "I then recalled that in section two of the medic training, I learned about controlled bleeding. I noticed that the wounded man had severe bleeding that he could not control. I used a towel as a dressing and asked the man to hold the towel on his wound and to raise his hand above his head to lessen the blood flow which allowed me to evaluate his other injuries which included a cut on his head."

By the time help arrived in the form of -- ironically enough -- an Army soldier, the individuals were in stable condition and awaiting the paramedics.

Galvanek's decisions were lauded by game project director Colonel Casey Wardynski. "Because of the training he received in America's Army's virtual classroom, Mr. Galvanek had mastered the basics of first aid and had the confidence to take appropriate action when others might do nothing. He took the initiative to assess the situation, prioritize actions and apply the correct procedures... Paxton is a true hero."

According to the developers of America's Army, this is the second time one of their users has reportedly applied techniques learned in the game to real-life emergency situations. You can find more information about the game at www.americasarmy.com.


"




 

Friday, February 22 @ 15:15:50 UTC (Read More... | 21 comments | Archived | Score: 0)


Archived: Losing Freedom - Piece by Piece
 

National News
National News  

OAKLAND, Calif.  Officials in Oakland have passed new rules putting restrictions on where smokers can light up.

The Oakland City Council unanimously approved an ordinance Tuesday that makes it illegal to smoke in outdoor dining areas, ATM lines, parks and bus stops.
Smoking will also be banned in child care centers and municipal golf courses.

Besides prohibiting smoking in some areas, the new rules will require landlords and condominium owners to notify prospective tenants and buyers of the smoking status of units they intend to move into.

The new law will go in effect on Oct. 23.

Oakland's ordinance follows a new law adopted last week in Belmont that will ban smoking in parks, other public places and inside apartments and condominiums.





 

Wednesday, October 17 @ 13:24:57 UTC (Read More... | 112 comments | Archived | Score: 0)


Time and Date
 
 
Login
 
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name.
 
Survey
 
Food War: Philly Cheese Steak v. Hot Italian Sub

Philly Cheese Steak
Hot Italian Sub



Results
Polls

Votes: 12
Comments: 54
 
K9 Clan Gallery
 

coupleinbed.jpg
coupleinbed. ...
  
20080320-10.skiløype.jpg
20080320-10. ...
  
childhead.jpg
childhead.jp ...
  
arda and iris.JPG
arda and iri ...
  
0101-16.2007.jpg
0101-16.2007 ...
  
0514-096.jpg
0514-096.jpg
  
0514-022.jpg
0514-022.jpg
  
0416-12_technik_museum_sinsheim.jpg
0416-12_tech ...
  
0416-04_technik_museum_sinsheim.jpg
0416-04_tech ...
  
1231-09.jpg
1231-09.jpg
  
house 001.jpg
house 001.jp ...
  
Part 19.jpg
Part 19.jpg
  
back of house.JPG
back of hous ...
  
0416-10_technik_museum_sinsheim.jpg
0416-10_tech ...
  
20080319-08.skycandle.jpg
20080319-08. ...
  
0409-01_technik_museum_speyer.jpg
0409-01_tech ...
  
Part 10.jpg
Part 10.jpg
  
0314-02.jpg
0314-02.jpg
  
0417-02_quack.jpg
0417-02_quac ...
  
Yellow Spider2.JPG
Yellow Spide ...
  
Part 7.jpg
Part 7.jpg
  
untitled18.jpg
untitled18.j ...
  
0409-07_technik_museum_speyer.jpg
0409-07_tech ...
  
untitled2.jpg
untitled2.jp ...
  
Part 8.jpg
Part 8.jpg
  

Photo Gallery

 








If you have questions, comments, or concerns, please contact the Admin/Webmaster - [K9] BlaQue Dawg. Yahoo IM: k9blaquedawg - Email: bd@k9clan.us

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2007 by me.