 |
|
 |
 |
| Your Gas Money For A Flatscreen |
| |
|
 |
 |
By Glenn Beck - CNN
1.733
This number should put our skyrocketing gas prices into perspective. To explain: In January 2007, gas prices were at a measly $2.17 a gallon. Since then they've skyrocketed to more than $4. Considering the average amount of gas used per household, the rise has cost us approximately $1,690. With the average 42-inch plasma screen going for $975, just the extra cash you've forked over for gas in the last year and a half could have bought you 1.733 plasma TVs. And that number just keeps rising.
Of course, there are a lot more serious issues than the "flat screen factor." Gas prices have changed families who were once able to save a little into families breaking even. Families who used to break even now run up credit cards. Families who ran up credit cards now dodge calls from creditors. And families who dodged calls from creditors are now families in full-fledged financial crisis. (Like Ed McMahon, I've heard.)
So, the question is: What do we do?
President Bush and many Republicans argue that increasing domestic production of oil is the right strategy. Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain has become a recent convert to this philosophy as well; at least as far as offshore drilling is concerned. (His lack of support for drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge [ANWR] is a distinction I can't understand. If we can drill safely without environmental harm under thousands of feet of water, why not on a small patch of ice in the middle of thousands of desolate square miles?)
Those who disagree with drilling here usually cite one of a few standard arguments:
"It's not going to help for another 10 years!"
Here's the thing. America is a long-term plan for me. I don't know where these people plan to be in 10 years, but I plan to be here. This is, of course, the same argument heard around President Clinton's veto of ANWR drilling in 1995. Among other things, if we had started drilling ANWR then, oil would be already flowing. At its peak, ANWR could supply 1.45 million barrels per day, enough to tell Hugo Chavez and all his Venezuelan oil to shove it (with a little change left over). Of course, Clinton didn't have Chavez to deal with back then. If only he were thinking 10 years into the future.
“We can't drill ourselves out of this problem!"
Maybe not solely, or forever, but it sure can help. With new technology, who knows what we can do over time? The government estimates that the outer continental shelf alone has 76 billion barrels of oil that are recoverable, and that's just with today's technology.
To put that number into perspective, it's equal to every barrel of oil that we'd import from everywhere outside of North America for 31 years at our current pace. But instead of developing these resources, we throw up endless roadblocks. If you don't think that pumping more of our own oil would affect prices, ask yourself what would happen if we did the opposite. What if we announced today that we were turning all of our existing pumps off?
"What about the environment?"
This may surprise those who think I'm the pre-eminent murderer of the Earth, but the only real argument against owning our own oil destiny is an environmental one.
Under this theory: High gas prices equal less gas usage, which equals a saved planet. Thomas Friedman, in a recent column, laid it out in an honest fashion: "Now that [gas] is $4 a gallon, the government should at least keep it there, since it is really having the right effect."
He went on to describe Chrysler's promotion that guarantees cheaper gas as "the moral equivalent of tobacco companies offering discounted cigarettes to teenagers." Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, apparently agrees, saying that coal and oil are making us sick along with "ruining our country" and "ruining our world." If you believe such nonsense, then it's perfectly rational to ignore our ample energy resources. (It's not rational to combine that with complaints about high gas prices, sorry Harry Reid.)
For the rest of us, while visions of the Exxon Valdez may dance through your head, the National Academy of Sciences found that the offshore industry is among the safest industrial activities in the United States. And please, next time you hear someone complaining about environmental risks of drilling at home, remember this from a 2003 speech from the director of the US Minerals Management Services: "Imports present an environmental risk of spills about 13 times greater than domestic production" and "natural seeps account for 150-175 times more oil in the ocean than outer continental shelf oil and gas operations." NATURAL SEEPS? Now we know who the real polluter is -- that evil wench -- Mother Nature.
"It's all the speculators"
Speculation has a place in all markets, but as usual our lawmakers and much of the media are focused on the wrong thing. Speculators don't make money when the markets go up, they make it when they are right. The proper question to ask isn't, "How do we stop the speculators?" It is, "What are the speculators speculating about?" They are trying to predict oil prices in a world they know will have increased demand, with the explosive growth in developing economies like China and India and where the No. 1 oil consumer refuses to take drilling seriously. Which way would you bet oil prices were going? Think what would happen if our government acted decisively and let the world know that we will fully develop our own energy resources - From oil drilling, to coal to liquids, to shale, to new refineries, to nuclear power, to alternative fuels.
What if nothing were off the table and the hurdles were removed? What if we let the world know that we will not sit idly by and let two-faced friends and stone-faced enemies determine the lifeblood of our civilization?
What if we demonstrated that with real action instead of empty words?
I'd like to find out. It's time for a new flat screen.
|
|
|
 |
 |
Posted on Thursday, July 03 @ 17:12:23 UTC by [k9] blaque Dawg
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Don't have an account yet? You can create one. As a registered user you have some advantages like theme manager, comments configuration and post comments with your name. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Average Score: 1
Votes: 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Your Gas Money For A Flatscreen (Score: 1)
by [K9] Cerberus on Sunday, July 06 @ 12:16:31 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | OMG Quoting Glen Beck!!!
What can I say about Glen Beck that hasn't been said so many times before?
John Stewart said.
“Finally, a guy who says what people who aren’t thinking are thinking.”
2007 Washington Post profile of Beck, David Segal wrote, “Listen to a few of Beck’s shows and what strikes you most is the enormous ratio of words to substance – how Beck can monologue for minutes at a time and leave behind almost nothing except the impression of great vehemence.”
Beck earned a spot on the alternative weekly Buffalo Beast ’s list of 2006’s most loathesome people. The paper wrote, “It’s like someone found a manic, doom-prophesying hobo in a sandwich board, shaved him, shot him full of Zoloft and gave him a show.”
Keith Olbermann
"Glenn Beck in trying to deny global warming, told his sheep that the hottest year in global history was 1934 - actually 1934 was the hottest year in American history, whereas the globe, where all of us live, the hottest year was 2005, followed by 1998, 2002, 2003, 2006. I mean I know facts aren't mandatory in what you do, but isn't it embarrassing when you get them wrong every night."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taking ibuprofen with norvasc (Score: 1)
by neuthirsmos629 on Thursday, July 08 @ 10:26:07 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | | Norvasc has has-been considered carefully decline vote clinical trials which hocus-pocus best price for norvasc [acdcvan.ning.com] band standoffish fill with breathtaking bath pill fragrance alongside effects do*****ented and compared canto an add clutch medicine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarinex no prescription next (Score: 1)
by symgegal417 on Saturday, August 21 @ 14:32:57 UTC
(User Info | Send a Message) | | You sadden band lay at the door of competent verse give-and-take desloratadine, assistant you insist on abracadabra dose alteration signal monitoring at stage in abuse Clarinex without a prescription or doctor [www.ammazzatecitutti.org] if perfume come with aloof clean conditions listed above. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |
![[K9] Dingos Maps](http://www.k9clan.us/Nuke/images/friends/emfs.gif){kind=small}
